Enable javascript in your browser for better experience. Need to know to enable it?

÷ÈÓ°Ö±²¥

La informaci¨®n en esta p¨¢gina no se encuentra completamente disponible en tu idioma de preferencia. Muy pronto esperamos tenerla completamente disponible en otros idiomas. Para obtener informaci¨®n en tu idioma de preferencia, por favor descarga el PDF ²¹±ç³Ü¨ª.
?ltima actualizaci¨®n : Nov 07, 2016
NO EN LA EDICI?N ACTUAL
Este blip no est¨¢ en la edici¨®n actual del Radar. Si ha aparecido en una de las ¨²ltimas ediciones, es probable que siga siendo relevante. Si es m¨¢s antiguo, es posible que ya no sea relevante y que nuestra valoraci¨®n sea diferente hoy en d¨ªa. Desgraciadamente, no tenemos el ancho de banda necesario para revisar continuamente los anuncios de ediciones anteriores del Radar. Entender m¨¢s
Nov 2016
Resistir ?

We know we're in perilous territory here, since we build a competing tool, but we feel we have to address a persistent problem. Continuous Integration tools like CruiseControl and Jenkins are valuable for software development, but as your build process gets more complex it requires something beyond just Continuous Integration: It requires a . We frequently see people trying to use Jenkins as a Deployment Pipeline with the aid of plugins, but our experience is that these quickly become a tangle. Jenkins 2.0 introduces "Pipeline as Code" but continues to model pipelines using plugins and fails to change the core Jenkins product to model pipelines directly. In our experience, tools that are built around a first-class representation of deployment pipelines are much more suitable, and this is what drove us to replace CruiseControl with . Today we see several products that embrace deployment pipelines, including ConcourseCI, LambdaCD, and GoCD.

Apr 2016
Resistir ?
Publicado : Apr 05, 2016

Suscr¨ªbete al bolet¨ªn informativo de Technology Radar

?

?

?

?

Suscr¨ªbete ahora

Visita nuestro archivo para leer los vol¨²menes anteriores